[New component request]: FPC connector 24 pos 0.5mm #3

Closed
opened 2023-11-01 21:20:22 +00:00 by AllSpiceAlice · 3 comments

Justification

No FPC connectors

Component type

Other

Where used

Page_Turner_EPaper_PCB

Estimated annual quantity

500

Footprint

use Wurth WR-FPC_0.5mm.PCBLib

Part numbers

Wurth Electronik 687124188722

Checklist (fill out later)

  • Checked library for existing parts
  • Price check
  • QTY check
  • Lead time check
  • Distributor part number
  • Datasheet review
  • Symbol review
  • Footprint review
  • Component check (symbol+footprint review)
  • Package check
  • Dimension check
  • Automotive grade
  • Space grade
  • FMEA analysis
### Justification No FPC connectors ### Component type Other ### Where used Page_Turner_EPaper_PCB ### Estimated annual quantity 500 ### Footprint use Wurth WR-FPC_0.5mm.PCBLib ### Part numbers ```true Wurth Electronik 687124188722 ``` ### Checklist (fill out later) - [ ] Checked library for existing parts - [ ] Price check - [ ] QTY check - [ ] Lead time check - [ ] Distributor part number - [ ] Datasheet review - [ ] Symbol review - [ ] Footprint review - [ ] Component check (symbol+footprint review) - [ ] Package check - [ ] Dimension check - [ ] Automotive grade - [ ] Space grade - [ ] FMEA analysis
AllSpiceAlice added this to the Page turner Epaper PCB milestone 2023-11-01 21:20:22 +00:00
AllSpiceAlice added the
priority/3 - medium
label 2023-11-01 21:20:22 +00:00
allspice-kyle was assigned by AllSpiceAlice 2023-11-01 21:20:22 +00:00
Author
Owner
Should be easy, footprint and symbol already in a repo Footprint https://hub.allspice.io/AllSpice/Altium-Library-Wurth/src/branch/main/Footprints/WR-FPC_0.50mm.PcbLib Symbol https://hub.allspice.io/AllSpice/Altium-Library-Wurth/src/branch/main/Symbols/Connector%20-%20FPC.SchLib

@AllSpiceUser will this connector work as well?

It's significantly lower cost, the solder tabs look a lot easier if we need to hand-solder, and I'm a bit more familiar with the locking mechanism.

An in-between could be this: https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/amphenol-cs-fci/F32Q-1A7H1-11024/11564641 $0.78 vs $3.50 for the Wurth one & still a reputable brand. Downside is that it's bigger.

@AllSpiceUser will [this connector](https://www.digikey.com.au/en/products/detail/cvilux-usa/CF20241U0R0-NH/15792965) work as well? It's significantly lower cost, the solder tabs look a lot easier if we need to hand-solder, and I'm a bit more familiar with the locking mechanism. An in-between could be this: https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/amphenol-cs-fci/F32Q-1A7H1-11024/11564641 `$0.78` vs `$3.50` for the Wurth one & still a reputable brand. Downside is that it's bigger.
Author
Owner

Yes. The substitute will work for me. I approved the PR.

Yes. The substitute will work for me. I approved the PR.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.