3d step file on wrong layers for chip resistors #76

Open
opened 2020-10-09 20:51:54 +00:00 by adamschoenwald · 2 comments
adamschoenwald commented 2020-10-09 20:51:54 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Unless otherwise listed below, all chip resistor pcblibs have 3d step file on layer 13 alongside the body outline.
Some 3d models are not centered over the pads.

VISHAY WSHP2818 --> body on 1, step on 13

These files did not have the above issue:
PCB - RESISTOR - CHIP - STACKPOLE CSR0402.PCBLIB
PCB - RESISTOR - CHIP - RES 2512_6432.PCBLIB
PCB - RESISTOR - CHIP - RES 1210_3225.PCBLIB
PCB - RESISTOR - CHIP - RES 0402_1005.PCBLIB

Unless otherwise listed below, all chip resistor pcblibs have 3d step file on layer 13 alongside the body outline. Some 3d models are not centered over the pads. VISHAY WSHP2818 --> body on 1, step on 13 These files did not have the above issue: PCB - RESISTOR - CHIP - STACKPOLE CSR0402.PCBLIB PCB - RESISTOR - CHIP - RES 2512_6432.PCBLIB PCB - RESISTOR - CHIP - RES 1210_3225.PCBLIB PCB - RESISTOR - CHIP - RES 0402_1005.PCBLIB
issus commented 2020-10-11 18:37:32 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Do you want to submit a pull request for the fixes? Otherwise I'm planning to write a program which will go through the library with AltiumSharp to look for issues like this on historic footprints which pre-date the current guidance :)

Do you want to submit a pull request for the fixes? Otherwise I'm planning to write a program which will go through the library with AltiumSharp to look for issues like this on historic footprints which pre-date the current guidance :)
adamschoenwald commented 2020-10-12 14:08:57 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Yeah I will do one later today.

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 2:37 PM Mark notifications@github.com wrote:

Do you want to submit a pull request for the fixes? Otherwise I'm planning
to write a program which will go through the library with AltiumSharp to
look for issues like this on historic footprints which pre-date the current
guidance :)


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/issus/altium-library/issues/76#issuecomment-706748450,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABS4GM45BCXA4QS6WDC27XDSKH3PTANCNFSM4SKQYU6Q
.

Yeah I will do one later today. On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 2:37 PM Mark <notifications@github.com> wrote: > Do you want to submit a pull request for the fixes? Otherwise I'm planning > to write a program which will go through the library with AltiumSharp to > look for issues like this on historic footprints which pre-date the current > guidance :) > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/issus/altium-library/issues/76#issuecomment-706748450>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABS4GM45BCXA4QS6WDC27XDSKH3PTANCNFSM4SKQYU6Q> > . >
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: AllSpice-demos/Altium-Celestial-library#76
No description provided.