Fix schematic and PCB errors #1
LOADING
daniel
commented 2024-08-06 05:48:27 +00:00
!thumbnail[](RPI-PICO-R3-PUBLIC.DSN){ diff="AllSpice-Demos/OrCAD-Demo:ad10cfced55b1abdba8d8a1c924de5d19d891bd7...d815fc8d16966b6c4b65eb4b0f26d05d4212cde7" pr="1" doc-id="67612bb56aa7d3a48b11" diff-visibility="full" variant="default" view-coords="76.0,32.5,94.4,46.3" aspect-ratio="1.405" }
Added LED connected to GPIO25
daniel
commented 2024-08-06 05:48:57 +00:00
!thumbnail[](RPI-PICO-R3-PUBLIC.DSN){ diff="AllSpice-Demos/OrCAD-Demo:ad10cfced55b1abdba8d8a1c924de5d19d891bd7...d815fc8d16966b6c4b65eb4b0f26d05d4212cde7" pr="1" doc-id="67612bb56aa7d3a48b11" diff-visibility="full" variant="default" view-coords="6.6,26.5,32.0,52.7" aspect-ratio="1.405" } @RevaReviewa , can you take a look at this new BOOTSEL switch?
RevaReviewa
commented 2024-08-06 05:49:31 +00:00
It looks great. Thank you for using the reference design from the library!
It looks great. Thank you for using the reference design from the library!
LOADING
brendan marked this conversation as resolved
Outdated
MikaChanical
commented 2024-08-06 05:40:24 +00:00
@AllSpiceAlice, mechanical review complete. No change to board outline, or mounting features. All new components (and old components) are below the height limit. It think it's ready!
@AllSpiceAlice, mechanical review complete. No change to board outline, or mounting features. All new components (and old components) are below the height limit. It think it's ready!
!thumbnail[](RPI-PICO-R3a-PUBLIC.brd){ diff="AllSpice-Demos/OrCAD-Demo:ad10cfced55b1abdba8d8a1c924de5d19d891bd7...d815fc8d16966b6c4b65eb4b0f26d05d4212cde7" pr="1" layers="81,82,1,32,116,115,111,67,66,42,41,65,64,40,37,38,35,36,110,109,108,107,33,34,58,57,106,105,104,103" diff-visibility="full" variant="default" view-coords="2.3,1.3,96.9,99.0" aspect-ratio="0.510" }
daniel
commented 2024-08-06 05:46:35 +00:00
!thumbnail[](RPI-PICO-R3a-PUBLIC.brd){ diff="AllSpice-Demos/OrCAD-Demo:ad10cfced55b1abdba8d8a1c924de5d19d891bd7...d815fc8d16966b6c4b65eb4b0f26d05d4212cde7" pr="1" layers="81,82,1,32,116,115,111,67,66,42,41,65,64,40,37,38,35,36,110,109,108,107,33,34,58,57,106,105,104,103" diff-visibility="full" variant="default" view-coords="28.3,61.1,63.9,74.4" aspect-ratio="0.510" }
Thank you for removing the alternate crystal footprint.
MikaChanical
commented 2024-10-17 00:17:28 +00:00
!thumbnail[](RPI-PICO-R3a-PUBLIC.brd){ diff="AllSpice-Demos/OrCAD-Demo:ad10cfced55b1abdba8d8a1c924de5d19d891bd7...d815fc8d16966b6c4b65eb4b0f26d05d4212cde7" pr="1" layers="81,82,1,32,67,66,42,41,65,64,40,37,38,35,36,33,34,57" diff-visibility="full" variant="default" view-coords="23.5,7.0,80.3,17.8" aspect-ratio="0.510" } @AllSpiceAlice , the spec for the mounting holes is 2.1mm (± 0.05mm). We're getting reports that the prototypes aren't hitting this spec. Can you check the actual file?
gautam
commented 2024-10-25 16:27:05 +00:00
!thumbnail[](RPI-PICO-R3a-PUBLIC.brd){ diff="AllSpice-Demos/OrCAD-Demo:ad10cfced55b1abdba8d8a1c924de5d19d891bd7...b0d764f6a36b18d467021a4ffdd30a93ac150476" pr="1" layers="81,82,1,32,67,66,42,41,65,64,40,37,38,35,36,33,34,57" diff-visibility="full" variant="default" view-coords="13.0,12.5,58.6,27.7" aspect-ratio="0.510" } @daniel Hey do we really need 10mil trace here?
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Adjusted based on RPI design